I know three things about you.

#1. Your writing takes time.

#2. You believe in AI speeding up your writing.

#3. You want to go big on Linkedin.

1 + 2 + 3 = You must know which AI works best for Linkedin.

So here's me comparing them all for you.

Few rules before starting...

#1. One shot. I use the same prompt for each tool. I regenerate twice maximum.

#2. Topics. I pick 3x different topics...

☑ Remote working turns cities into ghost cities.

☑ Content is the new gold rush in 2025 for sales teams.

☑ AI & the future of new protein discoveries. What does it matter more than the ChatGPT breakthrough?

#3. Grading. I will grade...

☑ The hook. It's the most important part.

☑ The format. How is it structured? What's in it?

☑ The language. Is it full of fluff & AI jargon?

EasyGen: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

☑ The hook ⭐⭐⭐⭐

Easygen has the most powerful and most consistent hooks on the market for Linkedin.

But sometimes, it has a bug and restates the topic (= the prompt) as the hook.

As soon as this is fixed, it's a 5/5.

☑ The format ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

This is EasyGen's strength.

World-class formatting. Under 60 characters sentences. Listicles. Variety.

If you keep regenerating, you will get a completely different Linkedin post.

☑ The language ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Little to no jargon. No AI/ChatGPT language detected.

Test #1

Test #2

Test #3

PS: I used the web app (app.easygen.io) and not the Chrome extension.

What I think about EasyGen...

→ It's a high-end Linkedin post generator to post every day.

→ It does not connect to your Linkedin to keep you safe.

→ It clearly knows what's a viral post (instead of a simple GPT layer).

Taplio: ⭐

☑ The hook ⭐

Questions as the hooks. Emojis. This is the entire playbook of what not to do.

☑ The format ⭐

All of the posts stopped mid-sentence. The sentences are too long, too packed.

☑ The language ⭐⭐

The traditional ChatGPT writing style.

Some of the titles have words sticking with each other.

Test #1

Test #2

Test #3

What I think about Taplio...

→ It generated the worst posts of the series.

→ It's connected to your Linkedin, and it could get you banned (read more here).

→ The only useful feature is finding viral posts. But hopefully, it's not scrapping Linkedin using your account to do so.

ChatGPT: ⭐⭐

☑ The hook ⭐

I hate questions as hooks. I hate emojis in the hook.

Genuine writing does not need emojis.

Compelling writing does not need questions to spark curiosity.

Get rid of them.

☑ The format ⭐⭐

We do have nice paragraphs, but they are way too long.

Big chunks of paragraphs are awful to read on Linkedin.

It's your job to suit modern devices like phones: provide white space, a lot.

☑ The language ⭐⭐

I was surprised. ChatGPT got slightly better.

A few months ago, I'd have graded it 1 star because it sounded a whole lot like AI.

But it's probably because of the memory feature: ChatGPT knows I hate this style of writing.

So you might have a different one. Test it yourself.

PS: Also, don't use hashtags. It's not 2010.

Test #1

Test #2

Test #3

What I think about ChatGPT...

→ It's incredibly powerful... but just as hard to make it work.

→ I think less than 0.1% of its users could steer it in the right direction for Linkedin.

→ Not only you need to know prompt engineering, but also stay up to date with Linkedin trends.

Claude: ⭐⭐⭐

☑ The hook ⭐

Emojis + Capital Letters To Every Word. Not good.

☑ The format ⭐⭐⭐

Much better than ChatGPT. I'm pleasantly surprised by the listicles.

Still got some useless hashtags at the end.

☑ The language ⭐⭐⭐⭐

Sounds better than ChatGPT... but still AI-generated.

With the right prompting, it can give you some solid copies still.

Test #1

Test #2

Test #3

What I think about Claude...

→ It's an all-purpose LLM, not suitable to write content specifically on Linkedin.

→ It's my go-to LLM to write quick copies compared to ChatGPT.

→ Still needs deep prompting / Linkedin knowledge to make it work.

Jasper: ⭐

☑ The hook ⭐

what

☑ The format ⭐

is

☑ The language ⭐

this

Test #1

Test #2

Test #3

What I think about Jasper...

→ It writes short, terrible copies. Vertical tools (focused only on Linkedin) are much stronger.

→ And it can't do tasks like LLMs (ChatGPT, Claude).

→ Absolutely zero interest in using Jasper.

MagicPost: ⭐⭐⭐

☑ The hook ⭐⭐⭐

Some questions... Some long hooks...

But overall, it's a 3 out of 5.

☑ The format ⭐⭐⭐⭐

Good formatting, probably what it does best. Limited to one style though.

☑ The language ⭐⭐⭐⭐

Few jargon, solid language.

PS: I can't upload the whole post with this tool. Even if I zoom out completely.

Test #1

Test #2

Test #3

What I think about MagicPost...

→ MagicPost is solid. But I realized a problem: it's always the same format → a listicle.

→ It is a good concept, but it might be limited as you get into posting more than once a week.

→ Legitimately the only competition to EasyGen on writing Linkedin posts.

RedactAI: ⭐⭐

☑ The hook ⭐⭐

Emojis + restating the prompt. Not good. One of them was ok (Test #2).

☑ The format ⭐⭐⭐

Good formatting, but still too many emojis.

That's my personal grading → good writers don't need emojis.

☑ The language ⭐

I'd have given it a 4 out of 5, but there is a problem: at some point, the post doesn't make any sense!

Check out Test #2 & #3. I can't explain it.

PS: I can't upload the whole post with this tool. Even if I zoom out completely.

Test #1

Test #2

Test #3

What I think about RedactAI...

→ Solid formatting, but too many emojis & terrible hooks. It's not consistent.

→ The hallucinations are the strongest, making it impossible to post without editing.

→ RedactAI would make you waste more time than you gain.

Conclusion

EasyGen is the best AI Linkedin post generator on the market.

Best hook. Best format. Best variety.

It's safe to use, and focuses on one thing → Linkedin.

It's on the higher-end pricing:

1. The first tier is $20... typically LLMs like ChatGPT or Claude.
2. The mid-tier is between $20 and $60... like Magic Post or Jasper.
3. The high-end tier is between $60 (EasyGen) and $200+ (Business Tier of every tool).

EasyGen is built for users who...

→ ...want to make sure their account is safe.

→ ...understand the value of Linkedin & personal branding.

→ ...prefer investing in a Linkedin-first tool instead of learning LLMs.

→ ...tried to write Linkedin posts for themselves, and want to get it right.

PS: Yes. I'm the founder of EasyGen (duh).

I built this tool, and went from 8,000 to 400,000+ followers on Linkedin.

I then did it again with my employees (from 0 to 16,000+ followers in 5 months).

It's my mission to help people win on Linkedin.

By showing them how to do it, and what to do with that success.

I had no choice but to create EasyGen and make it public.